[Athen] AHEAD E-Text Site Update

[Pratik Patel]

Besides, it's not only about blind and visually impaired "braille" users.

-----Original Message-----
From: athen-bounces at athenpro.org [mailto:athen-bounces at athenpro.org] On Behalf Of Ron Stewart
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 2:41 PM
To: 'Access Technologists in Higher Education Network'
Subject: Re: [Athen] AHEAD E-Text Site Update

I think the Texas bill is a good example of why we do not want state based
legislation to happen.  The NFB's lack of any national corrdination are
resulting in a direct negative impact on the achievement of a national
cooperative solution.  I think at you look at the issue of state based etext
laws you also need to look at the impact of a court challenge on these laws,
and I am of the opinion they will then fall like a house of cards setting us
all back in our work at least a decade..  

Ron Stewart

-----Original Message-----
From: athen-bounces at athenpro.org [mailto:athen-bounces at athenpro.org] On
Behalf Of James Bailey
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 2:08 PM
To: Access Technologists in Higher Education Network
Subject: Re: [Athen] AHEAD E-Text Site Update

The main force behind it is Ted Wenk from the Oregon Advocacy Center. I and
a few other Oraheaders have a meeting with him in mid-August to learn more
about the bill.

--
James Bailey
Adaptive Technology Access Adviser, University of Oregon
1299 University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403-1299
Office: 541-346-1076
jbailey at uoregon.edu

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:55:39 -0600, "Marks, Jim" <marks at mso.umt.edu> wrote:

> 

 
 
 

> Was the NFB of Oregon behind the  adoption of the Oregon 

law?  The NFB's position is that state adoption of post-secondary education 
textbook legislation helps motivate a national solution.  It's a familiar 
pattern since this is exactly what led to NIMAS and NIMAC in IDEA 2004.  
The NFB successfully managed to get about 40 states to adopt legislation
that 
called on publishers to provide electronic versions of their K-12 textbooks
for 
blind and visually impaired children.  The state laws are known as Braille 
Bills, and  they included other features of benefit to blind and visually 
impaired children.  From the NFB advocacy perspective, even bad state laws 
are helpful.  The ultimate prize here is national legislation, and the NFB 
is well on its way.  Don't know about the rest of you, but I find this 
political process very fascinating. 

> 

> 

> 

 

> Jim Marks 

> Director of Disability Services 

> University of 

Montana 

> jim.marks at umontana.edu 

> http://www.umt.edu/dss/ 

> 

 

> 

 

> 

 

>   

> 

> 

 > _______________________________________________

> Athen mailing list

> Athen at athenpro.org

> http://athenpro.org/mailman/listinfo/athen_athenpro.org


_______________________________________________
Athen mailing list
Athen at athenpro.org
http://athenpro.org/mailman/listinfo/athen_athenpro.org



_______________________________________________
Athen mailing list
Athen at athenpro.org
http://athenpro.org/mailman/listinfo/athen_athenpro.org