From johumber at iu.edu Tue Dec 1 06:10:01 2015 From: johumber at iu.edu (Humbert, Joe) Date: Sat Jun 9 18:32:58 2018 Subject: [Athen] JavaScript Frameworks/Libraries that Include Built-in Accessibility and Accessibility Checks for Unit Testing Message-ID: Hello Accessibility Listservs, I'm wondering if anyone has a good current list of JavaScript frameworks/libraries that help produce accessible code? I have received a few emails about: 1. Bootstrap Accessibility Plug-in: http://paypal.github.io/bootstrap-accessibility-plugin/demo.html 2. CMS Assets JavaScript Library: http://assets.cms.gov/ But I would like both feedback on these frameworks and other recommendations. My second question is does anyone have recommendations for incorporating accessibility evaluation into unit testing? I believe Tenon.io and Quail can be incorporated into unit testing, but I'm wondering if there are other options that people recommend as well. Thankx, Joe Joe Humbert Principal Accessibility Analyst Assistive Technology and Accessibility Centers University Information Technology Services Indiana University, IUPUI IT 210F (317) 274-4378 johumber@iu.edu http://atac.iu.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From madeleine_rothberg at wgbh.org Tue Dec 1 06:31:19 2015 From: madeleine_rothberg at wgbh.org (Madeleine Rothberg) Date: Sat Jun 9 18:32:58 2018 Subject: [Athen] QTI 2.2 specification, MathML, and drop down interactions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sean, It sounds like you found an interesting bug - maybe in QTI or maybe in the component coding or the browser you are using. You may find people who can help answer your question in the IMS forum for QTI: http://www.imsglobal.org/forums/ims-glc-public-forums-and-resources/question-test-interoperability-public-forum -Madeleine ----- Madeleine Rothberg Senior Subject Matter Expert National Center for Accessible Media at WGBH 617-300-2492 (voicemail) http://ncam.wgbh.org madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org From: Sean Keegan > Reply-To: Access Technology Higher Education Network > Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 8:12 PM To: Access Technology Higher Education Network > Subject: [Athen] QTI 2.2 specification, MathML, and drop down interactions Hello, I have an assessment application that developers are building according to the QTI 2.2 specification. One of the interaction types is that of a dropdown choice (like a menu) but implemented using Angular-Bootstrap. It is based off the following: https://angular-ui.github.io/bootstrap/#/dropdown As an example - there could be a sentence with a word missing and the dropdown menu would offer several choices so as to complete the sentence. While this interaction type can be made accessible and works fine for text content, it fails when MathML is used to present any math content. Visually the math is presented, but the MathML content cannot be read by any assistive technologies. In fact, interacting with this component from the keyboard becomes problematic if any AT is running at the time. As part of the IMS QTI 2.2 specification, MathML is "approved" for use in certain interaction types, one being InlineChoiceGroup in which the dropdown interaction is used. We have AT that supports MathML and yet by following the IMS QTI 2.2 specification, that content is no longer communicated to the user. I have been reviewing the Accessible Portable Item Protocol and best practices, but this points to the QTI 2.1 specification and does not appear to provide any direction as to how to resolve such an issue. Looking for suggestions from anyone who has any experience with these specifications. Take care, Sean -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From skeegan at ccctechcenter.org Tue Dec 1 13:57:44 2015 From: skeegan at ccctechcenter.org (Sean Keegan) Date: Sat Jun 9 18:32:58 2018 Subject: [Athen] QTI 2.2 specification, MathML, and drop down interactions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Madeline, Thanks - I will check out that forum. Take care, Sean On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Madeleine Rothberg < madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org> wrote: > Sean, > > It sounds like you found an interesting bug ? maybe in QTI or maybe in the > component coding or the browser you are using. You may find people who can > help answer your question in the IMS forum for QTI: > > > http://www.imsglobal.org/forums/ims-glc-public-forums-and-resources/question-test-interoperability-public-forum > > -Madeleine > > ----- > Madeleine Rothberg > Senior Subject Matter Expert > National Center for Accessible Media at WGBH > 617-300-2492 (voicemail) > http://ncam.wgbh.org > madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org > > From: Sean Keegan > Reply-To: Access Technology Higher Education Network < > athen-list@u.washington.edu> > Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 8:12 PM > To: Access Technology Higher Education Network < > athen-list@u.washington.edu> > Subject: [Athen] QTI 2.2 specification, MathML, and drop down interactions > > Hello, > > I have an assessment application that developers are building according to > the QTI 2.2 specification. One of the interaction types is that of a > dropdown choice (like a menu) but implemented using > Angular-Bootstrap. It is based off the following: > https://angular-ui.github.io/bootstrap/#/dropdown > > > As an example - there could be a sentence with a word missing and the > dropdown menu would offer several choices so as to complete the sentence. > > While this interaction type can be made accessible and works fine for text > content, it fails when MathML is used to present any math content. Visually > the math is presented, but the MathML content cannot be read by any > assistive technologies. In fact, interacting with this component from the > keyboard becomes problematic if any AT is running at the time. > > As part of the IMS QTI 2.2 specification, MathML is "approved" for use in > certain interaction types, one being InlineChoiceGroup in which the > dropdown interaction is used. We have AT that supports MathML and yet by > following the IMS QTI 2.2 specification, that content is no longer > communicated to the user. > > I have been reviewing the Accessible Portable Item Protocol and best > practices, but this points to the QTI 2.1 specification and does not appear > to provide any direction as to how to resolve such an issue. > > Looking for suggestions from anyone who has any experience with these > specifications. > > Take care, > Sean > > > _______________________________________________ > athen-list mailing list > athen-list@mailman13.u.washington.edu > http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/athen-list > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From steve.noble at louisville.edu Tue Dec 1 15:40:39 2015 From: steve.noble at louisville.edu (steve.noble@louisville.edu) Date: Sat Jun 9 18:32:58 2018 Subject: [Athen] QTI 2.2 specification, MathML, and drop down interactions In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: Hey Sean, We (the APIP accessibility task force) are actually working on a best practice document for associate interaction and match interaction in the short term, and in the longer term coordinating with the AQTI architecture activities regarding prototype implementations and which aspects of user interface accessibility to incorporate in updates to the QTI specification. None of this is near completion, but I can try to touch base with those taking the lead on this work and pull you into that discussion offline, it that would help. --Steve Noble steve.noble@louisville.edu 502-969-3088 http://louisville.academia.edu/SteveNoble ________________________________ From: athen-list [athen-list-bounces@mailman13.u.washington.edu] on behalf of Sean Keegan [skeegan@ccctechcenter.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 5:49 PM To: Access Technology Higher Education Network Subject: Re: [Athen] QTI 2.2 specification, MathML, and drop down interactions Thanks for the contact, Steve. In part, I am trying to understand if it is I who is misreading the spec or if the developers are trying something that is technically conforming but functionally not usable. We are also using MathJax, although it is being used in its default implementation. We did try a number of alternative solutions (aria labels, off-screen text, etc.) as well as modifying the Angular-Bootstrap component, but nothing seemed to work. I do need to have an immediate solution, but I would like to address the root issue. The developers keep insisting they are following the specification and because this is considered valid, the issue is believed to be with the assistive technology, not with the implementation. Unfortunately, there is little guidance as to how one should implement this specific interaction type so that it also supports accessibility. Is there going to be an update to the APIP documentation or is it considered current for the QTI 2.2 specification? Thanks again, Sean On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:50 AM, > wrote: Actually, this issue has surfaced in some of our APIP accessibility task force meetings. You may want to reach out to Paul Grudnitski from Pearson ?[paul.grudnitski@gmail.com], as he has developed some sample content where he used MathJax in a special configuration to get past this issue. This assumes that your interest is in getting something that works now in your specific implementation, as opposed to fixing the root problem for all mankind. --Steve Noble steve.noble@louisville.edu 502-969-3088 http://louisville.academia.edu/SteveNoble ? ________________________________ From: athen-list [athen-list-bounces@mailman13.u.washington.edu] on behalf of Madeleine Rothberg [madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 9:31 AM To: Access Technology Higher Education Network Subject: Re: [Athen] QTI 2.2 specification, MathML, and drop down interactions Sean, It sounds like you found an interesting bug ? maybe in QTI or maybe in the component coding or the browser you are using. You may find people who can help answer your question in the IMS forum for QTI: http://www.imsglobal.org/forums/ims-glc-public-forums-and-resources/question-test-interoperability-public-forum -Madeleine ----- Madeleine Rothberg Senior Subject Matter Expert National Center for Accessible Media at WGBH 617-300-2492 (voicemail) http://ncam.wgbh.org madeleine_rothberg@wgbh.org From: Sean Keegan > Reply-To: Access Technology Higher Education Network > Date: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 8:12 PM To: Access Technology Higher Education Network > Subject: [Athen] QTI 2.2 specification, MathML, and drop down interactions Hello, I have an assessment application that developers are building according to the QTI 2.2 specification. One of the interaction types is that of a dropdown choice (like a