[Athen] More on Miami University suit - Software accessibility

Ron Stewart ronrstewart at gmail.com
Thu May 14 18:31:07 PDT 2015

My guess would be this is the release of findings to the defendant not to
the public.

Ron Stewart

From: athen-list [mailto:athen-list-bounces at mailman13.u.washington.edu] On
Behalf Of Sean Keegan
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 7:04 PM
To: Access Technology Higher Education Network
Subject: Re: [Athen] More on Miami University suit - Software accessibility


The article below claims that the DOJ released its findings in June, 2014
regarding the case of the student against Miami-Ohio. Has anyone seen this
information available publicly? I can't seem to find the results of the DOJ
findings online.

My Google-fu is weak and lacking.



On May 14, 2015, at 3:30 PM, Laurie Vasquez <Vasquez at sbcc.edu> wrote:

Software Accessibility Suit

May 14, 2015


<https://www.insidehighered.com/users/carl-straumsheim> Carl Straumsheim

The U.S. Department of Justice is seeking to join a blind student's lawsuit
against Miami University in Ohio, saying the institution's website and
licensed software from vendors such as from Turnitin and Pearson are
inaccessible to students with disabilities.

Aleeha Dudley, who is blind, sued the university and its president in
January 2014, alleging it violated Title II of the Americans With
Disabilities Act of 1990. The law requires state entities such as public
universities to provide equal access to students with disabilities.

Dudley enrolled at the university in 2011 to study zoology, but says her
grades suffered because of "Miami's selection of software programs that
gratuitously exclude[d]" her from equal access to accessible course
materials, according to the complaint. Examples include digitized textbooks
described as "nearly useless and vastly inferior to the printed text,"
software not designed to be used with screen readers, and "unusable" tactile

The department launched an investigation of the university in April 2014.
Its findings, released that June, suggested the university had violated the
ADA. The department has since attempted to resolve the case, but on Tuesday
-discrimination-lawsuit-alleging-miami> moved to intervene.

The department will sometimes file a statement of interest in a case,
explaining a specific matter without taking a formal position. If the
department's motion to intervene is granted, however, it would join Dudley
in suing the university. The case is filed in a federal district court in

"We are pleased that the DOJ is taking this case and the issues that it
presents so seriously," said Chris Danielsen, director of public relations
for the National Federation of the Blind. The organization is assisting
Dudley in the case.

The university in a statement said it "continues to deny the allegations. We
take our obligations under the American Disabilities Act very seriously.
Miami provides extensive resources and accommodations for our disabled
students, and will continue to do so."

Miami is the latest university to draw scrutiny from the federal government
over its use of technology in the classroom. In
y-ensure-blind-students-access-materials-under-new> 2013, the department
reached a settlement with Louisiana Tech University over an issue that also
involved students with vision impairments.
-reach-settlement> Last month, the department settled a case with massive
open online course provider edX, which committed to making its platform
accessible to users with disabilities.

While the list of colleges and universities finding themselves in legal
trouble over accessibility issues continues to grow, advocates for students
with disabilities said they continue to wonder how many examples are needed
before it becomes a high-priority issue in higher education.

"The macro problem here that we're currently having to address, sort of
university by university, is that the technology and content providers are
not doing what they need to do to make their stuff accessible," Danielsen
said. "Currently the only mechanism that we have to address this is to go
after the colleges and universities, because they are the ones with the
buying power. They are the ones that can say, if they will, to a provider
that we will not purchase, we will not deploy your product if it's not

The organization is working with institutions and vendors to determine which
regulations both sides can agree on, Danielsen said.

The ADA covers colleges and universities, but not their software vendors,
said Daniel F. Goldstein, a lawyer who specializes in disability rights law.
He pointed out that institutions can influence the market by requiring
companies that respond to requests for proposals to detail how they will
make their software accessible to students with disabilities.

"Accessibility becomes a competitive edge once there's a tipping point of
enough schools saying, 'excuse me, but is your software accessible?'"
Goldstein, who also serves as counsel for the National Federation of the
Blind, said. "To get this fixed, it's going to need college and university
presidents saying this matters."

The department's proposed complaint lists a number of vendors whose software
it found to be inaccessible. In addition to the university's website, video
platforms Vimeo and YouTube, and word processor Google Docs, the complaint
also lists course work management software from LearnSmart, Pearson,
Sapling, Turnitin, Vista Higher Learning and WebAssign. The companies have
contracts with many colleges and universities, so it is unlikely that Miami
is using products not broadly found in higher education.

The companies did not respond or were unable to respond to requests for
comment Wednesday evening.

athen-list mailing list
athen-list at mailman13.u.washington.edu

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman12.u.washington.edu/pipermail/athen-list/attachments/20150514/2000b1e3/attachment.html>

More information about the athen-list mailing list