[Athen] Alternate Formats and Varying Editions of Textbooks

Wink Harner foreigntype at gmail.com
Fri Jan 17 10:12:30 PST 2020


Brandon et al

I thought I made it clear in my earlier response that proof of
ownership/possession was required, Not purchase.

Anyone enrolled in a course can purchase, rent, check out from the library,
borrow, buy used books. There are a lot of ways for any student to
"provide" this to me for alt-text remediation. I am assuming the copyright
risk in requesting files from publishers, and in a DSS office, I assume
this risk on behalf of the college.

I work from a perspective of equity: If all students are required to be "in
possession of" textbooks for classes, this does not exempt disabled
students from the requirement.

One judge's ruling about libraries in relation to HathiTrust and copyright
pertains narrowly to libraries and should not be inferred to apply to
disabled students in general.

My thoughts on a snowy Friday,

Wink

Wink Harner
Accessibility Consultant/Alternative Text Production
The Foreign Type

Portland OR
foreigntype at gmail.com
480-984-0034

This email was dictated using Dragon NaturallySpeaking. Please forgive
quirks, misrecognitions, or errata .


On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 8:45 AM Butler, Brandon (bcb4y) <bcb4y at virginia.edu>
wrote:


> Susan,

>

> You’re right, we should probably agree to disagree. But you (and others)

> may find this passage from Judge Barrington Parker’s opinion on the market

> effect of HathiTrust enlightening—apparently many authors are paid in grins

> and giggles when publishers sell books in accessible formats, so perhaps

> they would not be opposed to the same level of remuneration from

> universities:

>

> The fourth factor also weighs in favor of a finding of fair use. It is

> undisputed that the present-day market for books accessible to the

> handicapped is so insignificant that “*it is common practice in the

> publishing industry for authors to forgo royalties that are generated

> through the sale of books manufactured in specialized formats for the blind*....”

> Appellants' Br. 34. “[T]he number of accessible books currently available

> to the blind for borrowing is a mere few hundred thousand titles, a minute

> percentage of the world's books. In contrast, the HDL contains more than

> ten million accessible volumes.” J.A. 173 ¶ 10 (Maurer Decl.). When

> considering the 1976 Act, Congress was well aware of this problem. The

> House Committee Report observed that publishers did not “usually ma[ke]”

> their books available in specialized formats for the blind. H.R. REP. NO.

> 94–1476, at 73, 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5686. That observation remains true

> today.

>

>

> Best,

> Brandon

>

> On Jan 17, 2020, at 11:20 AM, Susan Kelmer <Susan.Kelmer at colorado.edu>

> wrote:

>

> I have read the white paper. It made some interesting points, but it has

> not convinced me, or my legal counsel, that we should be giving away files

> to students who have not obtained some form of the book – new, used,

> rental, digital download (aka Kindle/Nook), etc.

>

> If it was found out by non-disabled students that disabled students were

> getting their textbook materials for free, we would have an absolute RIOT

> on our hands, and it’s not a riot I want a part of.

>

> Also, I am an author. It pains me GREATLY to think that books that are

> written using blood, sweat, tears, AND MY TIME are just blithely given away

> to those with a disability, with no guilt or even thought to what that

> means. Authors are people too, and they are not writing for grins and

> giggles – they are writing because it is how they make their living.

>

> Giving away files is no different in my mind than illegal file sharing of

> music, movies, etc. In fact, it IS illegal in my mind, as it brashly

> abuses copyright of the authors who are writing the books in the first

> place.

>

> We are going to have to agree to disagree on this issue. I’ve been doing

> this work for 20 years and not one single time have I felt it was

> appropriate to give files to students without proof of ownership/possession

> (note I did not say proof of purchase).

>

> *Susan Kelmer *

> Alternate Format Production Program Manager

> Disability Services

> Division of Student Affairs

> *T* 303 735 4836

> *www.colorado.edu/disabilityservices

> <http://www.colorado.edu/disabilityservices>*

>

>

> <image001.png>

>

> *Due to the nature of electronic communication, the security of this

> message cannot be guaranteed. If you’ve received this email in error please

> notify the sender immediately and delete this message. *

>

>

>

>

>

>

> *From:* athen-list <athen-list-bounces at mailman12.u.washington.edu> *On

> Behalf Of *Butler, Brandon (bcb4y)

> *Sent:* Friday, January 17, 2020 9:09 AM

> *To:* Access Technology Higher Education Network <

> athen-list at u.washington.edu>

> *Subject:* Re: [Athen] Alternate Formats and Varying Editions of Textbooks

>

> Hi all,

>

> With all due respect to Susan and Wink, the claim that purchase is

> required by copyright law has no basis in copyright law. I am a copyright

> lawyer and one of the authors of the white paper, which was based in part

> on a convening of copyright experts, including lawyers from the University

> Counsels’ offices at UVA and the University of Michigan, the counsel to the

> Internet Archive, counsel to the Association of Research Libraries, and my

> friend Blake Reid, who is a professor at CU's law school and the Director

> of the IP Policy Clinic there. (The full list is in the Acknowledgments

> section of the paper.) I’m sure Blake would be happy to talk to you about

> the project if you have questions, Susan. He’s an expert in both disability

> law and copyright law.

>

> I can also assure you that the analysis in the white paper applies

> expressly to DSOs, universities, and even large groups of universities, and

> not only to libraries. It is based on legal provisions and precedent that

> apply broadly to any authorized entity (in the case of Section 121) and to

> any lawful user (in the case of Section 107).

>

> Finally, if you wait for *more* caselaw or for *another* revision of

> copyright, you may be waiting for a very long time, but luckily we have

> very recent caselaw AND revisions to copyright that make clear that no

> purchase is needed before accessible copies are provided to qualified

> recipients. The Authors Guild v. HathiTrust case is the*only *case ever

> to construe Section 121 or to apply Section 107 to accessibility. If we

> wanted to design the perfect case to prove that we can provide accessible

> copies to students without making them buy inaccessible copies, we couldn’t

> do much better than *HathiTrust. *In that case, the court considered

> whether the University of Michigan could provide accessible copies of books

> from the HathiTrust collection to students with print disabilities without

> any payment or permission from the copyright holders. The court

> said, categorically, yes. The recently-passed Marrakesh Treaty

> implementation bill made a few modifications to Section 121, and all of

> them were designed to expand accessibility. None of them added a purchase

> requirement, which did not exist prior to Marrakesh. So we have a recent

> case that is perfectly on point, and recent legislation that is also on our

> side.

>

> Anyway, that’s a short version of the much more detailed arguments in the

> white paper. I promise it’s not a tough read, and will reward your time and

> attention.

>

> Best,

> Brandon

>

>

>

>

> On Jan 17, 2020, at 10:01 AM, Susan Kelmer <Susan.Kelmer at colorado.edu>

> wrote:

>

> Mary,

>

> The student deserves to have the right version of the textbook, period.

> If everyone else in the class, and the instructor, are using the 7th edition

> then why are you telling your student with a disability that they can only

> have the 6th? That is RIPE for a lawsuit filed by the student against

> your institution.

>

> Get the edition the student needs, remediate as necessary. That is our

> job, and we need to be doing our job.

>

> Ignore the people who have responded that your student doesn’t have to

> show proof of ownership (note I did not say proof of purchase). That white

> paper that is being tossed around covers LIBRARIES but does not cover DSOs

> producing alternate format directly. This is still a very grey area, and it

> is better to err on the side of caution until further clarification from

> the courts or the federal government. A white paper is not law, it is

> simply an opinion piece. I ask for proof of ownership from the student

> (aka, show me your book). And I give students the version they are

> requesting and have obtained. There are some publishers that require proof

> of purchase before they provide files, which means I then do ask the

> student for a receipt, which I heavily redact of any personal/identifying

> information and provide to the publisher.

>

> *Susan Kelmer *

> Alternate Format Production Program Manager

> Disability Services

> Division of Student Affairs

> *T* 303 735 4836

> *www.colorado.edu/disabilityservices

> <http://www.colorado.edu/disabilityservices>*

>

>

> <image001.png>

>

> *Due to the nature of electronic communication, the security of this

> message cannot be guaranteed. If you’ve received this email in error please

> notify the sender immediately and delete this message. *

>

>

>

> *From:* athen-list <athen-list-bounces at mailman12.u.washington.edu> *On

> Behalf Of *Mary Popish

> *Sent:* Thursday, January 16, 2020 5:50 PM

> *To:* athen-list at u.washington.edu

> *Subject:* [Athen] Alternate Formats and Varying Editions of Textbooks

>

> Hello, everyone!

>

> I have a question about how different campuses manage alternate format

> delivery for textbooks when the required edition is different from a

> digital version that your office may already have from a previous year or

> other student. For example, if your office has a digital version of the

> sixth edition of a textbook and a student has purchased the seventh edition

> but needs some remediation to make the book accessible digitally, what do

> you do? Do you request the seventh edition from the publisher (or

> Bookshare, or AccessText, or whatever your process is)? Do you check with

> the student and the instructor and deliver the sixth edition if it would

> still work for the class? What about copyright, since the student bought a

> different edition of the book?

>

> We've been talking about this a lot in our office, and we haven't landed

> on a great solution yet. I'd love to hear how other offices handle this

> sort of thing.

>

> Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks so much!

>

> Mary

>

> *Mary Popish*

> Adaptive Technology Specialist & Alternate Formats Coordinator

> Disability Resource Center

> Portland State University

>

> Phone: (503) 725-9119

> Fax: (503) 725-4103

> Email: drc at pdx.edu

> URL: http://www.pdx.edu/drc

> Pronouns: she / her / hers

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> athen-list mailing list

> athen-list at mailman12.u.washington.edu

> http://mailman12.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/athen-list

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> athen-list mailing list

> athen-list at mailman12.u.washington.edu

> http://mailman12.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/athen-list

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> athen-list mailing list

> athen-list at mailman12.u.washington.edu

> http://mailman12.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/athen-list

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman12.u.washington.edu/pipermail/athen-list/attachments/20200117/42a4c6b6/attachment.html>


More information about the athen-list mailing list