[Athen] Best practise for threads in discussions.
john.gardner at orst.edu
Thu Feb 5 17:28:28 PST 2009
I agree with Patrick about top down information. But I fear we may be a
minority. Or maybe just unfashionable.
From: athen-bounces at athenpro.org [mailto:athen-bounces at athenpro.org] On
Behalf Of Patrick Burke
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 4:41 PM
To: athen at athenpro.org
Subject: Re: [Athen] Best practise for threads in discussions.
Overall, after much experience & consideration, I give it a big Who Cares.
... But then I'm a long-time proponent of top-posting (when you open a new
message, the newest content is right there, & if you need context you can
read further down...). So it may not be wise to listen to me. ...
I suppose the "Re7: ..." method is better than "Re: re: re: re: ...", if I
have to choose a method of showing this.
If we're talking about an online forum situation, some sites use nested
lists very effectively to show subthreads. It gets a little wordy with all
the "nesting level 2" indicators (via Jaws in my case). But this method does
show very clearly which messages are originals & which are follow-ups.
That's my theory. I hope somewhat helpful.
At 03:22 PM 2/5/2009, E.A. Draffan wrote:
>This is a question I have just received and my feeling is that we need
>to get better at using subject lines correctly, but please can anyone
>give me some pointers to good practice.
>"I've been asked what would be the best way of conveying nesting
>structure to screenreader users so that they could understand whether a
>reply was to the original message in the thread or to a subsequent
>message. Do you have any opinions or resources on that issue?"
>Best wishes E.A.
>Mrs E.A. Draffan
>Learning Societies Lab,
>ECS, University of Southampton,
>Tel +44 (0)23 8059 7246
>Athen mailing list
>Athen at athenpro.org
Patrick J. Burke
UCLA Disabilities &
Phone: 310 206-6004
E-mail: burke <at> ucla. edu
Athen mailing list
Athen at athenpro.org
More information about the athen-list