[Athen] Budget cuts and Assistive Technology in campus computer
& Disability Service technology campus availability (Paul E. Paire)
JElmer at vcccd.edu
Thu Jul 2 18:09:32 PDT 2015
You have such smart posts!
For software that doesn't work this way, is"key server" technology still in use, and are AT vendors still allowing it's use. It served/serves the same purpose....allowing only the licensed number of uses (seats) at any given time.
On Jul 2, 2015, at 3:24 PM, James Bailey <jbailey at uoregon.edu<mailto:jbailey at uoregon.edu>> wrote:
Just to mention the obvious, don’t forget the distinction between software “seats” and “installs.” You could have a 10 seat package of JAWS (or other AT) installed on several hundred computers. You would be limited to just 10 copies running at the same across all the computers. It works pretty well with computer labs limited to registered students as your DS should know how many screen-reader users have requested services. (I know a student does not have to register with DS, but in my experience, students who are blind generally do.) This does not work so well in a public lab as you cannot estimate the usage. It also eliminates the potentially messy situation of managing a single computer reserved for AT users.
James Bailey M.S.
Accessible Education Center
University of Oregon
From: athen-list [mailto:athen-list-bounces at mailman13.u.washington.edu] On Behalf Of Aura Mollick Hirschman
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 10:57 AM
To: athen-list at u.washington.edu<mailto:athen-list at u.washington.edu>
Subject: [Athen] Budget cuts and Assistive Technology in campus computer labs, & Disability Service technology campus availability (Paul E. Paire)
Hi All. In addition to Bryon's timely question, I would like to add:
My campus (and our system) is facing severe cuts, as you may have already heard. We have General Access Computer Labs/Lounges around campus that have AT software, (e.g. JAWS, ZoomText, Kurzweil, R&WG). The question came up today in a meeting with IT as to whether we need all of these in the labs. This question is being asked in light of the budget cuts, but also given all of the new accessibility features in Windows 8 and the accessibility features in the Mac. I do not equate the Windows updates or Mac updates with providing the AT (referred to in our meeting as accessibility software) that students need, but this seems to be the way that the IT folks are thinking. We discussed individualized accommodations, ADA, and accessibility. I explained how students use AT according to their disability, skills and abilities, environment, and tasks, and how their preferences are important in determining what is reasonable for the individual.
At the meeting we agreed that we would look into student use statistics for our AT installed in the labs. This will include the last two years. We also agreed that I would gather info from other campuses on how, where and what AT is needed to insure we are meeting the needs of all of our students, considering retention, but also recruitment.
Here are some questions. How do you make AT available in your campus computer labs? If a student transitions to college after using one type of AT, like Kurzweil, through K-12, is it reasonable to expect them to change to another type of AT, such as RWG, if that is all that is available through the school? Is there any guidance out there as to what a campus should minimally offer in AT? Has this been tested in the courts? How many students do you think look at AT offerings when making their decisions to come to a campus? (none, some, many?) Any data? Feel free to respond here or get in touch by phone.
I'm also watching the responses to Bryon's recent inquiry. Thanks for reading through my wordy questions.
Aura M. Hirschman, M.S., C.R.C.
Senior Counselor/Alternative Text Program Coordinator
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Accessibility Resource Center
Mitchell Hall, Room 103
3203 North Downer Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53211-3153
phone (414) 229-5660
fax (414) 229-2237
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: This email and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). If this email contains any student specific data or information, these laws apply. If you are NOT the intended recipient(s) of this email, please disregard the content, delete the email message and notify the original sender.
athen-list mailing list
athen-list at mailman13.u.washington.edu<mailto:athen-list at mailman13.u.washington.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the athen-list